Sample, sample size and sampling: a review of current recommendations
Abstract
Introduction: The present review is based on the need to know the current recommendations on the sample, sample size and sampling that are considered in various empirical studies, aspects that certainly can generate confusion especially in novice researchers. In this sense, a theoretical and methodological framework is established that attempts to answer different questions raised on this subject, based on publications in high impact journals, guaranteeing their credibility and suitability. Objective: Provide a guide that offers different views on sample sizes and their practical application for researchers, teachers and students. Method: Theoretical study in the form of a narrative review. Results: Current recommendations revolve around performing power analysis to calculate the sample size, regardless of the type of sampling to be used, in addition to the fact that it is a good practice to be guided by the sample sizes of other studies with similar characteristics, preferably from journals indexed in high-level databases. However, it is necessary to clarify that this work should not be taken as a definitive guide, but that it is the duty of the researcher to be informed of new updates in methodologies that may arise on this subject. Conclusions: The choice of sample size depends on multiple factors that should be carefully analyzed.
Downloads
References
Abt, G., Boreham, C., Davison, G., Jackson, R., Nevill, A., Wallace, E., & Williams, M. (2020). Power, precision, and sample size estimation in sport and exercise science research. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(17), 1933-1935. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1776002
Adwok, J. (2015). Probability Sampling - A Guideline for Quantitative Health Care Research. The Annals of African Surgery, 12(2), 95-99. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/aas/article/view/126349
Althubaiti, A. (2022). Sample size determination: A practical guide for health researchers. Journal of General and Family Medicine, 24(2), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.600
American Psychological Association. (2018). Journal Article Reporting Standards (JARS). APA Style. https://apastyle.apa.org/jars
Andrade, C. (2020). Sample Size and its Importance in Research. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 42(1), 102-103. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_504_19
Arias-Gómez, J., Villasís-Keever, M. Á., & Miranda-Novales, M. G. (2016). El protocolo de investigación III: la población de estudio. Revista Alergia México, 63(2), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v63i2.181
Ato, M., López-García, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
Ato, M. y Vallejo, G. (2015). Diseños de investigación en Psicología. Ediciones Pirámide.
Ayhan, H. (2011). Non-probability Sampling Survey Methods. International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, 979-982. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_41
Barriopedro, M. I. (2015). La significación estadística no es suficiente. [Statistical significance is not enough]. RICYDE. Revista internacional de ciencias del deporte, 11(40), 101-103. https://doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2015.040ed
Brysbaert, M. (2019). How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72
Cortés, M., Mur, N., Iglesias, M., & Cortés, M. (2020). Algunas consideraciones para el cálculo del tamaño muestral en investigaciones de las Ciencias Médicas. MediSur, 18(5), 937-942. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1727-897X2020000500937&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
Ferrando, J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18-33. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77812441003
Fuentelsalz, C. (2004). Cálculo del tamaño de la muestra. Matronas Profesión, 5(18), 5-13. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6125940
García-García, J. A., Reding-Bernal, A., & López-Alvarenga, J. C. (2013). Cálculo del tamaño de la muestra en investigación en educación médica. Investigación en Educación Médica, 2(8), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-5057(13)72715-7
Goodwin, K., & Goodwin, C. (2017). Research in Psychology: Methods and Design. Wiley
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis. (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015). The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science. PLOS Biology, 13(3), e1002106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106
Hernández, R., & Mendoza, Ch. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw Hill Education
Kline, R. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (5th ed). Guilford Press
Krefeld-Schwalb, A., Hua, X., & Johnson, E. (2025). Measuring population heterogeneity requires heterogeneous populations. PNAS, 122(8), e2425536122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2425536122
Leenen, I. (2012). La prueba de hipótesis nula y sus alternativas: revisión de algunas críticas y su relevancia para las ciencias médicas. Investigación en Educación Médica, 1(4), 225-234. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-50572012000400010
Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El Análisis Factorial Exploratorio de los Ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
Martínez-Ezquerro, J. D., Riojas-Garza, A., & Rendón-Macías, M. E. (2017). Significancia clínica sobre significancia estadística. Cómo interpretar los intervalos de confianza a 95%. Revista Alergia México, 64(4), 477-486. https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v64i4.334
Martínez-Mesa, J., González-Chica, D. A., Bastos, J. L., Bonamigo, R. R., & Duquia, R. P. (2014). Sample size: how many participants do I need in my research? Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 89(4), 609-615. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143705
Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), i-xx. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01
Merino-Soto, C., & Angulo-Ramos, M. (2020). Significancia práctica de resultados no paramétricos: aportes a «satisfacción e índice de masa corporal y su influencia en el autoconcepto físico». Revista Española de Salud Pública, 94. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1135-57272020000100029
Mooi, E., Sarstedt, M., & Mooi‐Reci, I. (2018). Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using Stata. Springer.
Otzen, T., & Manterola, C. (2017). Técnicas de Muestreo sobre una Población a Estudio. International Journal of Morphology, 35(1), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037
Padrão, E., Melo, C., Fernandes, G., & Magalhães, A. (2018). p-Hacking – A call for ethics. Pulmonology, 24(3), 207-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2018.03.001
Pineda, S., & Sirota, M. (2018). Determining significance in the new era for p-values. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 67(5), 547-548. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002120
Quispe, A. M., Pinto, D. F., Huamán, M. R., Bueno, G. M., & Valle-Campos, A. (2020). Metodologías cuantitativas: Cálculo del tamaño de muestra con STATA y R. Revista Del Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo, 13(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.35434/rcmhnaaa.2020.131.627
Schober, P., Bossers, S. M., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Statistical Significance Versus Clinical Importance of Observed Effect Sizes: What Do P Values and Confidence Intervals Really Represent? Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(3), 1068-1072. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002798
Stefan, A. M., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2023). Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p-hacking strategies. Royal Society Open Science, 10(2), 220346. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220346
Stratton, S. J. (2023). Population Sampling: Probability and Non-Probability Techniques. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 38(2), 147-148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X23000304
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035
Trafimow, D., Amrhein, V., Areshenkoff, C. N., Barrera-Causil, C. J., Beh, E. J., Bilgiç, Y. K., Bono, R., Bradley, M. T., Briggs, W. M., Cepeda-Freyre, H. A., Chaigneau, S. E., Ciocca, D. R., Correa, J. C., Cousineau, D., de Boer, M. R., Dhar, S. S., Dolgov, I., Gómez-Benito, J., Grendar, M., Grice, J. W., … Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2018). Manipulating the Alpha Level Cannot Cure Significance Testing. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 699. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00699
White, M. (2022). Sample size in quantitative instrument validation studies: A systematic review of articles published in Scopus, 2021. Heliyon, 8(12), e12223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12223
Whitehead, A. L., Julious, S. A., Cooper, C. L., & Campbell, M. J. (2016). Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 25(3), 1057-1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280215588241
Willie, M. (2024). Population and Target Population in Research Methodology. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 4(1), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v4i1.405
Copyright (c) 2025 Interacciones
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication and that they can edit it, reproduce it, distribute it, exhibit it and communicate it in the country and abroad through printed and digital media.
The digital version of the journal is registered under a Creative Commons license (Under Creative Commons License): Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Therefore, this work can be reproduced, distributed and publicly communicated in digital format, provided that the names of the authors and Interacciones.
Therefore, it is established that authors can make other independent and additional behavioural agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in institutional repositories or publish it in a book) as long as it is clearly indicated that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
